Handling runtime errors in JavaScript using try/catch/finally
Error handling, like many aspects of JavaScript, has been maturing since
the dark ages of Netscape and IE4.
No longer are you forced to settle for what the browser throws in your face
in an event of a JavaScript error, but instead can take the matter into your
own hands. The try/catch/finally
statement of JavaScript lets
you dip your toes into error prune territory and "reroute" when a
JavaScript "exception" is
encountered. Along with other defensive coding techniques such as
Object
detection and the onError event, try/catch/finally
adds the ability to
navigate around certain errors that in the past would have instantly stopped
your script at its tracks. No more!
try/catch/finally
try/catch/finally
are so called exception handling
statements in JavaScript. An exception is an error that occurs at
runtime due to an illegal operation during execution. Examples of
exceptions include trying to reference an undefined variable, or calling
a non existent method. This versus syntax errors, which are
errors that occur when there is a problem with your JavaScript syntax.
Consider the following examples of syntax errors versus exceptions:
alert("I am missing a closing parenthesis //syntax error
alert(x) //exception assuming "x" isn't defined yet
undefinedfunction() //exception
try/catch/finally
lets you deal with exceptions gracefully.
It does not catch syntax errors, however (for those, you need to use
the onerror event). Normally whenever the browser runs into an
exception somewhere in a JavaScript code, it displays an error message to
the user while aborting the execution of the remaining code. You can put
a lid on this behaviour and handle the error the way you see
fit using try/catch/finally
. At its simplest you'd
just use try/catch
to try and run some code, and in the
event of any exceptions, suppress them:
try{ undefinedfunction() } catch(e){ //catch and just suppress error }
Assuming undefinedfunction()
is undefined, when the browser
runs the above, no errors will be shown. The syntax for try/catch/finally
is
a try
clause followed by either a catch
or finally
clause (at least one or
both of them). The catch
clause if defined traps any errors that has
occurred
from try
, and is indirectly passed the error object that
contains additional info about the error. Lets see a slightly more complex
example now:
try{ undefinedfunction() alert('I guess you do exist') } catch(e){ alert('An error has occurred: '+e.message) }
Click on the above button, and notice how only "An Error has
occurred"
alert pops up, but not "I guess you do exist". This tells us that when
try
encounters an error, it immediately skips any remaining code inside it and
goes straight to catch
. The default error message is obviously suppressed,
though you can still retrieve this information by accessing the Error object
that gets indirectly passed into catch
. We'll look at the Error object in
detail on the next page.
There's another clause, finally
, that if defined will be
executed regardless of whether an error occurs in the try
clause proceeding it:
try{ undefinedfunction() alert('I guess you do exist') } catch(e){ alert('An error has occurred: '+e.message) } finally{ alert('I am alerted regardless of the outcome above') }
finally
can be useful when you need to "clean up" after some
code inside try
. While it's true finally
will always be
executed if defined, certain statements inside try such as continue
,
break
,
return
, or when an error has occurred and there is no catch
clause will all
cause finally
to be executed immediately thereafter. In the following
example, the value "5" is alerted, since control is handed over to
finally
when i reaches 5 inside try:
try{ for (var i=0; i<10; i++){ if (i==5) break x=i } } finally{ alert(i) //alerts 5 }
Nested try/catch/finally statements
As a reminder, try
should never be defined just by itself, but always
followed by either catch
, finally
, or both. Within each clause, you can
define additional try/catch/finally
statements following the same
aforementioned rule. Take the instance where an error has occurred within the
catch
clause- defining an additional try/catch
statement inside it takes care of it:
var ajaxrequest=null if (window.ActiveXObject){ //Test for support for different versions of ActiveXObject in IE try { ajaxrequest=new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XMLHTTP") } catch (e){ try{ ajaxrequest=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP") } //end inner try catch (e){ alert("I give up. Your IE doesn't support Ajax!") } //end inner catch } //end outer catch } else if (window.XMLHttpRequest) // if Mozilla, Safari etc ajaxrequest=new XMLHttpRequest() ajaxrequest.open('GET', 'process.php', true) //do something with request
Here I'm using a nested try/catch
statement to try and determine in IE
which version of the ActiveX Object it supports that's needed to initialize
an Ajax request. Using object detection won't work here, since the issue
isn't whether the browser supports ActiveXObject
here, but
which version.
- Overview of try/catch/finally
- The Error object and throwing your own errors